As the recovery continues to limp along, there is more talk about
austerity. Tighten your belts. Cut government spending. Balance the
budget. Raise taxes. Pay down the debt. The Eurozone has become the
poster child for austerity recently as its attempts to right its
sinking fiscal ship has produced mass unemployment and falling living
standards through much of its southern tier. Spain's sky-high
unemployment has been blamed on EU austerity measures by those on the
left, as has the UK's stubbornly low growth since David Cameron's
Conservatives took over in 2011. Austerity has become politicized as
uber-Keynesians such as Paul Krugman insist that austerity is
counterproductive. He argues that austerity only damages the economy by
worsening poverty and unemployment while keeping the benefits of the
wealthy elite intact. He has also recently suggested that Fed Chair
Ben Bernanke was unnecessarily prolonging the current slowdown by not
supplying more economic stimulus to kick start the moribund US
economy.
Austerity is often controversial because there is always a choice for
policymakers. They can choose to cut their spending and debt or they
can borrow more money and risk inflation and their credit rating down
the road. For some countries this isn't much of a choice as borrowing
may not be much of an option since high debt levels means ultimately
unsustainably high premiums on debt. While Spain and Greece may be at
the precipice where they have less choice in the matter, countries like
the UK and the US aren't quite so limited. They could choose to borrow
more money and commit to more stimulus without an immediate risk of
rising interest rates and inflation. But the key word there is
"immediate". Can borrowed money really solve such structural problems
or is it merely delaying the inevitable day of reckoning? Keynes and
his followers suggest somewhat ironically that time is on our side: "in
the long run, we are all dead." Why worry about debt levels and
inflation now as long as the status quo is maintained? Debt is
actually economically useful and necessary as long as it doesn't get
out of hand. Just where the tipping point lies is a matter of
interpretation, however.
As the debate over austerity continues to rage, it is worth noting how
the planets may be reflecting this absence of consensus. It was all
stimulus and growth in early 2012 when Jupiter was dominant. Its
series of aspects with Pluto, Uranus and Saturn coincided with a
significant rally in the stock market that was fueled by the Fed's
Operation Twist in September and the Dollar-Euro swap announced in
December. Since March, Jupiter has been less prominent in the sky as it
has separated from its aspects with these other planets. Not
surprisingly, the market has been unable to make significant new
highs. The negative consequences of austerity have now come into focus
while growth continues to lag. Without more Jupiter, the recovery
can't seem to move into a higher gear. At the same time, austerity
itself has come under attack perhaps because Saturn is not in the
spotlight either. With neither Jupiter or Saturn taking the reins, we
are stuck in the contested middle where there is no clear direction.
Saturn may be more likely to make a reappearance in May and June.
This will occur in time when the EU is likely adjusting to a new
anti-austerity French President Hollande following the likely defeat of
Nicolas Sarkozy on 6 May.
With a new face as the Elysee Palace, the EU and ECB may have a tougher
time coorindating its various financial activities. Saturn will enter
sidereal Virgo in mid-May and then it ends its retrograde cycle at the
end of June. Both events are potentially significant and may well
intensify caution and pessimism in financial markets.
Stocks moved mostly higher last week on the strength of positive
earnings announcements by market leaders Apple and Amazon. In New
York, the Dow rose almost 2% closing at 13,228 while the S&P 500
finished at 1403. Markets were more bearish in Mumbai, however, as the
Sensex fell to 17,134 while the Nifty ended the week at 5190. This
outcome was largely in keeping with expectations as the early week
Sun-Mars-Rahu alignment did produce some significant downside across
most markets. The rebound coincided quite closely with the
Moon-Venus-Jupiter pattern that began on Tuesday and continued for much
of the rest of the week.
This week may well see more Venusian upside as it maintains its close
association with Jupiter and also becomes enmeshed with Mercury. The
positive Mercury influence is perhaps more likely to arrive in the
second half of the week. Mars remains in close aspect with Rahu,
however, so there remains some potential for sudden declines,
especially early in the week. As the Sun approaches its conjunction
with Jupiter on 13 May, we could see more central bank 'jawboning'
about the joys of borrowed stimulus and the evils of austerity.
Jupiter is the CEO of optimism after all, and it likes to keep as many
people happy as possible.